A Foundation for Talents and Specializations

Talents (and specializations) in AGE need some work. They do not have a discernable formula between requirements and ranks (novice, expert, master, etc) and each benefit value. Starting off from start-of-new-action-model-for-age definition of actions and TN design, we can build a pattern for talents and specializations.

Talents, Target Numbers, and Requirements

A talent will generally be a new action or a bonus to an existing action. For a talent with a bonus we propose that the bonus is based on stat-equivalencies and that these raise the TN of the base action.

  • The amount of equivalent TN the bonus adds is the requirement.
  • If a talent does not add a bonus and instead just another action then no bonus is required nor a requirement.
  • The requirement can use an ability score or a focus or both. Use the total as the TN bonus being applied to the talent. One ability and one focus would equal a bonus TN of 3

Talent Advancement

Talents have at least three tiers or ranks (more in other AGE versions). You can improve from novice to expert to master. The feeling is that each rank should probably be more powerful than the previous however that isn't done in practice with existing talents. Talent ranks are taken in order and we can use that to define an advancement structure. Given a choice we can either get a +1 from an ability or choose a talent. Therefore the second rank should have additional value because we are forced to take the pre-requisite. Here is what I could propose for advancement.

  • Novice
    • +1 additional talent bonus
  • Expert
    • +2 additional talent bonus
  • Master
    • +3 additional talent bonus

If a talent has no requirements that means:

  • novice rank is equivalent a regular TN 11 major action, or TN 9 minor action.
  • expert tank is TN 12 major action etc...
  • master rank is a TN 13 major action etc...

Specializations

Specializations do not need to be treated any differently. They most likely will have a higher requirements, with many having at least 2 from 2 ability scores. This would confer a based TN bonus of +4. This would mean a novice specialization could have a +8 damage bonus, expert have +10 damage bonus, and master a +12 damage bonus. This seems a bit extreme but it is built on the requirements, so you could tone that down to a +2 requirement and reign in the value. I think that is the easiest thing to do if rebalancing existing specialization, just reduce requirements to match the benefits.

Balancing Existing Talents and Specializations

I would figure out the TN on each of the ranks, then given the rank bonus find the rank that requires the highest base TN and use that to set the requirement. For example, let's look at the "Chirurgy" talent.

  • Novice - reduces major to minor action, which is a 2 TN value
    • this would be +1 (since novice), and +2 value with 2 TN total value
    • needs a +1 TN requirement
  • Expert - value is increase 1d6 on average (2 X 1d6, from 1 X 1d6), a 2 TN value
    • this would be +2, and +2 value, with a 4 TN total value
    • needs a +2 TN requirement
  • Master - value is increase again by 1d6, another 2 TN value
    • this would be +3 (since master), and a +2 value, for a total of +6 overall value
    • needs a +3 TN requirement
Given that the original requirement is the Healing (Intelligence) focus we would have a baseline bonus of +2. This is more then enough for the novice which only needs a +1 base but also just enough for the expert which needs a +2 base. The master however still needs a base of +3 which means we do need to increase the requirements for this talent. INT 1 and Healing focus would be just right.

Classes

Class requirements are boring and I personally remove them and thus do not provide any benefit.

Future Work

This is just a start. Most of the bonuses found in talents can be found in the equivalency guide and balanced around. The biggest missing piece is passive effects that don't use actions. I think this is a similar case to spells with duration. For durations I double the value, so this would mean a +1 passive bonus to TN would be +2 value overall. As an example the novice bonus for single weapon style is a +1 defense passive for the encounter, which I would value at +2 TN for pricing. I do plan on expanding the equivalent list with other bonuses to be complete, however I think most are easily matched to a TN or SP or HP.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fantasty AGE 2nd Edition - What's different?

The second edition of Fantasy AGE is now available! I got the pdf as I was a play tester and I was granted access to a preview pdf two weeks before release. I have high expectations with this edition as a chance to revisit old mechanics and add improvements from the other books. In this post I will go through at a very high level pointing out what is new or different to the first edition in each of the book's chapters. https://greenroninstore.com/collections/frontpage/products/fantasy-age-core-rulebook-pdf I hope you enjoy this review and let me know if you have any thoughts on Fantasy AGE subreddit https://www.reddit.com/r/FantasyAGE Chapter 0 - Introduction Very similar in topics Summary of change from first to second edition Removed mention of Titansgrave (RIP) Chapter 1 - Character Creation Determining Abilities - a few differences in what is recommended 2nd edition recommends starting with 13 advancements and allocating them as you wish to your ability scores as fits your char...
Read more

Equivalent Dice for AGE

Image
  The test roll for the "Adventure Game Engine" is 3d6. I was experimenting with some math and realized the TN 10,11,12 probability chance lines up perfectly with 1d8 die with TN 3,4,5. Therefore you could realistically switch from 3d6 to 1d8+6 without changes to any system numbers. Yes you lose the opportunity to roll doubles but for this thought experiment we are OK with that. There are few main advantages for 1d8+6 over 3d6. The first is a single die which is easier to do math with and does not have a curved probability distribution (it's a straight line). The second is that it maintains a compact rolling range which won't feel as swingy as d20 does. The plus six makes a firm foundation such that the average of the roll is only 50% of the base. Compared to d20 where a modifier of plus 1 is only 9% of the overall roll value. A plus one here is more like a +7 which is 60% of the roll value. So much less of the overall roll value is random. The third advantage is that...
Read more

Fantasy AGE 2e Classes Overview

Second Edition Changes Classes received probably the most of the changes in second edition. The high level changes are: Envoy class Defense advancements Level 6, 11, 16 you get +1 defense Focus advancements At level 11 every focus the character has is automatically upgraded from +2 to +3 At level 11 you are allowed to spend another focus advancement to improve the bonus to +4 Specialization advancements A level 1 you get a specialization advancement In first edition this was at level 4 You ignore ability and focus requirements, but not class requirements when choosing  Additional advancements are recieved at odd levels This is a total of 10 advancements in 2e 1e only had 6 total advancements at level 4, 6, 8, 12, 14, 16 Common Class Advancements There is a new layout for classes which groups advancements into patterns (like even an...
Read more